Final answer:
Franklin Felon violated criminal law through the act of homicide and civil law by subjecting the victims' families to potential wrongful death claims. Criminal charges can lead to imprisonment or death, while civil cases focus on financial compensation for the victims' losses.
Step-by-step explanation:
The act of Franklin Felon shooting and killing two people during a robbery is a violation of both criminal and civil law. In criminal law, this act is considered homicide, which is the unlawful taking of another person's life. Common charges in such a case include murder or manslaughter, depending on the circumstances, and if convicted, Felon could face severe penalties including imprisonment or possibly the death penalty.
In civil law, the victims' families might bring a wrongful death lawsuit against Felon. Such a civil case would allow the families to seek financial compensation for their losses. This form of legal action addresses the impact of the defendant's actions on the victims' relatives and is unrelated to the aim of criminal law, which is to punish the offender.
Therefore, Franklin Felon's actions violated criminal law by infringing upon the rights to life and safety of the individuals he killed, and he violated civil law by causing harm and potential financial loss to the victims' families.