Question

*due at midnight help*

Worth 50 points and brainless if right

Which inference can be made about Daniel Williams based on “healing a wounded heart:Daniel Hale Williams”?

Part A
Dr. Williams had people who could not afford to pay in mind when he opened provident hospital.
Dr. Williams knew exactly what to do when faced with the prospect of performing heart surgery
Dr. Williams was not only a skilled doctor, he was also a kind and thoughtful person
Dr. Williams became very wealthy and famous but never lost sight of his purpose


Part B

Which evidence from the passage best supports your answeR to part A

“Daniel Hale Williams was not foolish-on the contrary he was very careful”
“Dr. Williams was called in. The doctor reassured the patient with his calm, dignified manner”

“Williams was confident that he could help. But then he saw the wound-it went deep into the chest, perhaps into the heart”
“Provident was the first hospital in the United States in which black and white doctors worked together to care for all patients, regardless of race”

Answer 1

I think the answer for Part A is C and I think the answer for Part B is B

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps let me know if I was correct :)

Answer 2

solidly rooted in society. Remarkably, at present all

major political parties are deeply rooted in society. The

UDF’s formidable organization, when combined with

the staying power and enduring unity of the BSP and

the loyalty of the MRF’s followers and activists, is

giving rise to a polity in which parties—rather than

spellbinding leaders, the state apparatus, independent

local strongmen, the military, or private oligarchs—are

the central actors in political life. As the Italian experi-

ence demonstrates, pluralistic partyocracy can engender

clientelism, dysfunctional politicization of parts of the

private sector, and political sclerosis. The Italian expe-

rience also shows that pluralistic partyocracy can spur

consolidation of democracy and progress toward

prosperity in a poor, peripheral, and demoralized land.

M. Steven Fish is an associate professor of political science at the

University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of

Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the

New Russian Revolution (Princeton University Press, 1995).

Robin S. Brooks is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of polit-

ical science at the University of California, Berkeley. She is writing

her dissertation on ethnic self-identification and nation building in

postcommunist Europe.