105k views
0 votes
The numerator of a fraction is 1 less than the denominator.

When both numerator and denominator are increased by 2,
the fraction is increased by . Find the original fraction.

1 Answer

1 vote

There is missing data in the problem, I have added it to solve the problem. You can use your real data once you understand the explanation.

Answer:

Original fraction:


\displaystyle (5)/(6), \ (-9)/(-8)

Explanation:

The numerator of a fraction is 1 less than the denominator and when both parts are increased by 2, the value of the fraction increases by 1/24. Find the original fraction.

Let's call:

x=original numerator

x+1=original denominator

x+2=increased numerator

x+3=increased denominator

Original fraction:


\displaystyle (x)/(x+1)

Increased fraction:


\displaystyle (x+2)/(x+3)

The difference between both is 1/24:


\displaystyle (x+2)/(x+3)-(x)/(x+1)=(1)/(24)

Multiply by (x+3)(x+1):


\displaystyle (x+3)(x+1)(x+2)/(x+3)-(x+3)(x+1)(x)/(x+1)=((x+3)(x+1))/(24)

Simplifying each fraction when possible:


\displaystyle (x+1)(x+2)-(x+3)(x)=((x+3)(x+1))/(24)

Operating:


\displaystyle x^2+3x+2-x^2-3x=(x^2+4x+3)/(24)

Simplifying:


\displaystyle 2=(x^2+4x+3)/(24)

Multiplying by 24:


48=x^2+4x+3

Rearranging:


x^2+4x-45=0

Factoring:


(x-5)(x+9)=0

We have two solutions:


x=5, x=-9

Selecting the first solution:

Original fraction:


\displaystyle (5)/(6)

Increased fraction:


\displaystyle (7)/(8)

The difference between both is:


\displaystyle (7)/(8)-(5)/(6)=(21-20)/(24)=(1)/(24)

This is a valid solution

Selecting the second solution:

Original fraction:


\displaystyle (-9)/(-8)=(9)/(8)

Increased fraction:


\displaystyle (-7)/(-6)=(7)/(6)

The difference between both is:


\displaystyle (7)/(6)-(9)/(8)=(28-27)/(24)=(1)/(24)

This solution is only valid if we express the fractions with their negative values. When we simplify them, the first condition is not met. Thus, the solutions are:

Original fraction:


\displaystyle (5)/(6), \ (-9)/(-8)

Note: The last solution can be arguable because the real simplified fraction is not a solution. My opinion is that it's valid as long as it's expressed with their original signs.

User Amatellanes
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories