51.3k views
0 votes
Which statement best explains these two points of

view?
O Martin believed that the slave trade should be
considered constitutional, while Rutledge did not.
O Martin wanted to ban only the slave trade, while
Rutledge wanted to ban the practice of slavery
outright
O Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge
wanted to preserve the practice of importing
enslaved workers.
O Martin did not want to impose a tax on importing
enslaved workers, while Rutledge wanted to create
such a tax.

User Subbdue
by
4.1k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

NORTHERN, SOUTHERN

Step-by-step explanation:

User Elisha
by
4.3k points
5 votes

Answer: Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge

wanted to preserve the practice of importing

enslaved workers.

Explanation: In the passage, Martin asks for a tax or prohibition (ban) on Slave trade, while the other argued that three states would never go along with that and "the expectation is vain".

User Marthin
by
4.3k points