Question

Part A

Which inference can be drawn from "Are Dogs Dumb?"

Dogs often do things that seem strange to humans.

Dogs are not as good as worms at running through mazes.

Dogs show a limited ability to learn new things.

Dogs show no sign of having great intelligence.
Question 2
Part B

Which evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A?

"But the same mutt might also bark at the vacuum cleaner and spend a whole hour chasing his own tail."

"So the test has to be something the dog can learn to do: select a block by nudging it with a nose or a paw, for example."

"Even worms can be taught to run mazes."

"But why do we assume that bigger beasts are smarter than smaller ones?"

Answer 1

Part A: Dogs do Things that are strange to humans

Part B: But the same mutt might also bark at the vacuum cleaner and spend a whole hours chasing his own tail

Explanation: i took the test :D

Answer 2

Part A: Dogs do Things that are strange to humans

Part B: But the same mutt might also bark at the vacuum cleaner and spend a whole hours chasing his own tail

Explanation: I Took the test plus I got to K12 Hope this helps!