174k views
3 votes
Parents are responsible for making decisions for their children's medical care. This right extends to refusing or discontinuing medical treatment even if it is life threatening. This right has been challenged and upheld in court. You are working in the emergency room and an ambulance has just brought in a child who has been hit by a car. You recognize the child right away. This is a child from your neighborhood. The parents are not with the child and the child has no identification. The trauma doctor says the child will need blood and when stabilized, will need to go to surgery. You know that the parent's religious beliefs prevent them from agreeing to either procedure. If you tell the ER staff who the patient is, they will call the parents for consent and the child will die. If you do nothing, the child has a chance to make it.

What is the ethical dilemma in this situation?

What should you do?

What would you do?

User Dubace
by
5.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

First TRY to stabilize him and then get a crewmate not on duty to call the parents after the kid is in operation and say he was in dire conditions and i forgot they didn't want him to go into procedures

And I would save the kid the parents like that seem evil I don't care if i would have to pay I would want to save him . . .

User VoidStack
by
5.0k points