Register
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago a States do not have the ability to create laws that are in violation of
213k views
22 votes
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago

a States do not have the ability to create laws that are in violation of the Bill of Rights.

b States may violate the Bill of Rights but citizens must be notified in a timely fashion so they can move if they choose to do so.

c States must first consult with the Supreme Court when making laws that could possibly contradict the Bill of Rights.

d States are only able to create laws that have federal approval.

User Yashwanth Kata
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

the answer might be d, States are only able to create laws that have federal approval.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jporcenaluk
by
7.3k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.3m questions

12.0m answers

Other Questions

Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
When mixed with alcohol, a medication can become all of the following, except __________ . A. healthier B. useless C. unpredictable
Who is the petitioner and who is the respondent?
A district attorney ____________________. a. represents suspected law breakers in court b. decides criminal cases c. runs the court system at the county level d. brings criminals to justice
What power does the house of representatives solely possess?
Link Copied!