Register
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago a States do not have the ability to create laws that are in violation of
213k views
22 votes
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago

a States do not have the ability to create laws that are in violation of the Bill of Rights.

b States may violate the Bill of Rights but citizens must be notified in a timely fashion so they can move if they choose to do so.

c States must first consult with the Supreme Court when making laws that could possibly contradict the Bill of Rights.

d States are only able to create laws that have federal approval.

User Yashwanth Kata
by
4.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

the answer might be d, States are only able to create laws that have federal approval.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jporcenaluk
by
5.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.7m questions

7.5m answers

Other Questions

Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jacinda be licensed?
Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
When an excessive amount of alcohol is consumed causing a person to stop or breath slowly, vomit in their sleep. or appear pale or bluish the person is possibly suffering from • Binge drinking Intoxication
1. MIDTERM TEST Midterm 13. Which of the following gives the Constitution the final word in regards to this country's legal code?
Which constitutional amendment established birthright citizenship in the US? (please help)
Link Copied!