Register
Do you think medical and scientific advancements should be heavily regulated and supervised? Why or why not?
188k views
3 votes
Do you think medical and scientific advancements should be heavily regulated

and supervised? Why or why not?

User Vilson Vieira
by
4.5k points

1 Answer

2 votes
Honestly I think it should be. Sometimes different individuals get placed on experiments, and such. After, they bring home some of their greatest work, and use it against the technical use for it. If that made any sense :)
User Johannes Kuhn
by
5.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

4.7m questions

6.1m answers

Other Questions

Which of the following is not one of the part of speech
Consider: Some people Africa are carriers for Ebola. Therefore, all flights originating in Africa should be restricted from entering the United States. This is an example of which common fallacy? A) begging
Who has disappeared? A. Bosche B. Kraler C. Dussel D. Koophius
Read the excerpt from a student’s essay. From the beginning, Rainsford is an individual who enjoys the hunt and wastes no thought on the animals he kills. On the boat, Whitney expresses some empathy
Which thesis statement is well worded? A) five percent of the federal budget should be used to make businesses more energy efficient to prevent an energy crisis. B) At least 26% of the federal budget should
Link Copied!