55.5k views
0 votes
The French army stayed behind in Egypt—and so did the scholars. In late August, shortly after Napoleon's departure, a large, heavy package arrived at the scholars' palace in Cairo. When they opened it, they found it contained a black stone slab covered with writing in three different scripts.

A note from a French army officer accompanied the package. He told the scholars that the stone had been unearthed in an old fort near the town of Rosetta, thirty-five miles north of Alexandria. French soldiers were tearing down a ruined wall in the fort when they came upon the slab.


Which statement accurately describes a cause-and-effect relationship described in this excerpt?


Because Napoleon departs for France, the French army and scholars decide to stay in Egypt.

Because the French army and scholars decide to stay in Egypt, Napoleon decides to depart for France.

Because the French soldiers are tearing down a ruined wall in a fort, they discover

User Alex Chin
by
4.8k points

1 Answer

2 votes

This question's options are incomplete. I've found them online. They are the following:

Which statement accurately describes a cause-and-effect relationship described in this excerpt?

A. Because Napoleon departs for France, the French army and scholars decide to stay in Egypt.

B. Because the French army and scholars decide to stay in Egypt, Napoleon decides to depart for France.

C. Because the French soldiers are tearing down a ruined wall in a fort, they discover the Rosetta Stone.

D. Because the French soldiers are searching for the Rosetta Stone, they tear down a ruined wall in a fort.

Answer:

The option that accurately describes a cause-and-effect relationship in this excerpt is:

C. Because the French soldiers are tearing down a ruined wall in a fort, they discover the Rosetta Stone.

Step-by-step explanation:

The excerpt does not mention why Napoleon departs from Egypt nor why the scholars and the army stayed behind. Therefore, we do not have enough information to establish a cause-and-effect relationship here. For that reason, we can easily eliminate letters A and B.

We can also discard letter D. According to it, while looking for the stone, the army destroyed a wall. However, the army did not know about the existence of the stone. They were not looking for it. Its discovery was accidental while they were tearing down a ruined wall. That is precisely what letter C explains. For that reason, it is the best option.

User Dediqated
by
5.0k points