Question

The soldiers walked through the rain as they approached the canyon. They’d been traveling for days to reach the dragon’s lair. Finally they arrived. Then the dragon approached, and it roared. Yet, the soldiers faced off with the dragon, despite the noise.

Which is the best critique explaining why Henrique should revise the paraphrase?

Answer 1

The most persuasive argument for why Henrique should change the paragraph is that he has to use more descriptive language to bring the narrative to life. A literary method that is frequently employed is descriptive language. Fundamentally, the purpose of descriptive language is to let the reader visualize the scenario or character in their minds. Henrique's account presents the sequence of events in a logical order, but it is devoid of the descriptive language that would provide specifics to those occurrences and encourage the reader to become involved in the plot.

Answer B

Hope this helps.

Answer 2

option B. The best critique to explain why Henrique should revise the paragraph is that he needs to add some descriptive language to make the story come alive. In literature a commonly used device is the one of descriptive language. Basically, descriptive language is used to create a picture of the scene/character in the reader's mind. Henrique's story is laying the order of events in a logical order but it is lacking the descriptive language that will give details to those events, making the reader to engage with the story line.

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation: