Question

Simon has a $250,000 life insurance policy with City Life. He has had this policy for many years, and all of the premiums have been paid. He no longer needs to make any payments in order to keep the policy in effect. Simon named his brother, Leo, as the beneficiary of the policy. Leo needs $50,000. Leo knows about the insurance policy, and that it is fully paid. Rather than take out a loan, he contacts City Life and asks for $50,000 as an advance against the full amount of the policy that will be due to him. What is City Life likely to do?

Answer 1

The correct statement will be "Not give Leo the money since Leo is not vested".

Step-by-step explanation:

• Simon wanted to purchase a city life insurance package.
• Under that same agreement arrangement, Simon has compensated have all premiums owed.
• As that of the beneficiary including its scheme, Simon designated his brother, Leo.

Leo requires 50,000 dollars. He reaches the urban environment instead of accepting a mortgage as well as demands for the amount owed including its gain that would accumulate to him following his brother's passing.

The remaining amount through Life insurance policies can only be compensated on Simon's death and nobody even, particularly Simon and his brother Leo, seems to have the authority to charge any compensation payout against that kind of policies especially given the fact that almost all the contributions have been compensated.

So the above is the right approach.