Final answer:
Using labeling theory, a symbolic interactionist would note that while both speeding and driving under the influence are illegal, the latter is more likely to be labeled as deviant due to its serious consequences and social stigma.
Step-by-step explanation:
A symbolic interactionist applying labeling theory would approach the question of the difference between driving five miles per hour over the speed limit and driving under the influence of alcohol by considering how society responds to and labels these behaviors. Speeding is typically a primary deviance; it doesn't result in a lasting perception of the individual as 'deviant,' nor does it have a profound effect on their self-image. However, driving under the influence is seen as more grave, usually incurring more serious legal consequences and social stigma, marking it as a significantly deviant behavior. Even if both actions are illegal, they are labeled differently: one as a minor infraction and the other as a dangerous and socially unacceptable act.
The behavior that most exemplifies deviance, in this case, is driving after consuming a large amount of alcohol because it is likely to be met with stronger societal reaction and labeling, contributing to the person's self-concept as a 'deviant.' Unlike minor speeding, which is often excused or overlooked, driving under the influence generally leads to harsher judgment and penalties, which reflects society's collective attitude that this behavior is more dangerous and therefore deviant.