Final answer:
New France had a smaller population, was more directly controlled by the French crown, and its economy revolved around the fur trade, while the 13 Colonies had a larger population, various forms of self-governance, and a diversified economy with agriculture as a cornerstone.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing new France and the 13volonice in terms of population, government, and economy, we observe substantial differences arising from distinct colonial goals and environmental contexts. The population of New France was significantly smaller than that of the 13 Colonies, largely due to differing immigration policies and harsher living conditions. In terms of government, New France operated under a more direct royal control compared to the relatively autonomous and varied forms of colonial governments in the British colonies. Economically, the 13 Colonies had a diverse economy based on family farms, the raising of livestock, and the cultivation of cash crops, especially in the South, whereas New France focused on the fur trade with Native Americans due to shorter growing seasons in the north.
The British settlers in the 13 Colonies established robust agricultural practices alongside commercial and industrial ventures. By contrast, French efforts concentrated on establishing trading alliances with Native Americans, primarily for beaver pelts. This economic focus influenced the societal interactions and cultural intermingling, as many French traders married Native American women, which contributed to the creation of the métis community. The result of these interactions and their long-term impacts shaped the distinct identities of the regions well into the future.