Final answer:
The mention of Clever Hans is effective in highlighting the importance of critical analysis of supposed 'facts', aligning with the paper's overall intent to demonstrate cultural awareness and promote anti-racist and inclusive language to engage readers from diverse backgrounds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering the context of the question, it seems the author includes the information about Clever Hans as an example to illustrate the concept of nonessential and essential information. By discussing this famous case, the author may be aiming to highlight how easily individuals can be misled by surface-level understanding, if critical analysis of the evidence is not applied.
Clever Hans was a horse that appeared to be able to perform arithmetic and other intellectual tasks. The example is effective because it encourages readers to think critically and analyze information deeply, meshing well with the broader theme of connecting evidence and intent in rhetorical choices which is paramount for cultural awareness. This is ultimately tied to the author's efforts to use anti-racist and inclusive language, showing a conscious choice in what details to include in their writing to engage readers from a variety of cultural backgrounds.
Together, the inclusion of Clever Hans, an emphasis on cultural awareness, and the challenge to conventional expectations underscore the broader goal of the text: to promote critical thinking and cross-cultural understanding.