Question

Identify which of the arguments for restricting trade that each of the following rebuttals directs against. Rebuttals The Jobs Argument The National-Security Argument The Infant-Industry Argument The Unfair-Competition Argument The Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument (A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers. (B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers. (C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs. (D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living.

Answer 1

The rebuttals direct against the Unfair-Competition, National-Security, and Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip arguments.

Step-by-step explanation:

(A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers. - Rebuttal to the Unfair-Competition Argument

(B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers. - Rebuttal to the National-Security Argument

(C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs. - Rebuttal to the Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument

(D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living. - Rebuttal to the Jobs Argument

Answer 2

(A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers.

The Unfair-Competition Argument

(B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers.

The Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument

(C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs.

The Infant-Industry Argument

(D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living.

The Jobs Argument

Step-by-step explanation: