43.2k views
5 votes
The industrial revolution was a time of great change for great Britain, and women benefited the most from these changes. Children were also able to find work in the new factories that spring up and cities. In the children were often not paid well and forced to work long hours and dangerous conditions, the benefits far outweigh the problems. Poor man also had more opportunities and were able to make more money than before the industrial revolution. This new earning power allow them to better contribute and helped grow the nations economy.

which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument?

A. The historical argument is not credible because it does not make a claim about women during the industrial revolution.

B. The historical argument is not credible because it does not support the claim with evidence from a credible source.

C. The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source.

D. The historical argument is credible because it makes the correct claim that woman benefited from the industrial revolution.

please answer fast I need the answer for Apex

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer: Answer is “A”!!!!!!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

User Anargund
by
4.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

Is not credible because it does not support the claim with evidence f4

Step-by-step explanation:

The industrial revolution was a time of great change for great Britain, and women-example-1
User Yakir GIladi Edry
by
4.5k points