Register
Why do historians draw different conclusions about events of the past?
143k views
1 vote
Why do historians draw different conclusions about events of the
past?

User Jon Catmull
by
4.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

A historian may rely on evidence to support different conclusions. The historian has to evaluate the primary sources and explain why different conclusions can be argued.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Psoares
by
4.7k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.1m questions

6.7m answers

Other Questions

The appellate court system in Georgia was established by what? A. state statute B. U.S. Statute C. Constitutional amendment D. the supreme court​
Need immediate answer! Giving 5 stars and thanks if you're correct. Checking after test! "It's important to judge others by their merits, rather than their appearance." Which passage from the strangers
People who take a "marble cake" view of federalism believe thatstate governments are too weak to meet most citizen needsstate governments are supreme over the national governmentnational and state governments
The president of the U.S lives and works in which building?
Wei goes skateboarding regularly and determined he can develop better balance. He wants to begin other activities that can help him improve. Which two sports share the most common skills? Softball and
Link Copied!