How did the court rule in wisconsin v. mitchell

Question

asked Mar 25, 2021 209k views

1 Answer

Jonny White · Answer 1 · 2021-03-29T03:19:00+0000

They ruled unanimously that there is a meaningful distinction between punishing the content of speech and using speech as evidence of motive in a crime. (Unanimously- agreed to by all)

How did the court rule in wisconsin v. mitchell

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

No related questions found

Categories

Other Questions