Using the given definition, for
, we have

Right away, we see x and -x in the numerator, so we can drop those terms.

Remember that limits distribute over sums, i.e.

so we can separate the h from everything else in the numerator:

Since h ≠ 0, we have
, so the second limit is simply 1.

For the remaining limit, focus on the numerator for now. Combine the fractions in the numerator:

Recall the difference of squares identity,

Let
and
. Multiply the numerator and denominator by
, so that the numerator can be condensed using the identity above.




Back to the limit: all this rewriting tells us that

Again, the h's cancel, and we can pull out the factor of -1 from the numerator and simplify the fraction:

The remaining expression is continuous at h = 0, so we can evaluate the limit by substituting directly:


or, if we write
, we get
