Question

Contrast the Massachusetts Body of Liberties to the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut.

Answer 1

The Massachusetts Body of Liberties was a document that listed the basic rights of citizens, while the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was a plan for government that included a process for passing laws, electing representatives, and removing leaders who failed to act in the people's best interest.

Answer 2

Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court.

Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 orders or laws and a preamble that rendered the General Court as supreme.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were both legal frameworks established by the citizens of colonies for administrative purposes. The major difference between the two frameworks is that the Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court. In other words, it included liberties and rights of the people as citizens of the colony.

On the other hand, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 specific orders or laws and a preamble which provided the General Court with executive, judicial and legislative authority. It made the General Court the most supreme authority of the colony.