212k views
0 votes
The cost of a movie ticket in a large city has increased exponentially over the decades since 1953 when records were first kept. A function that models the cost is

C=1.25(1.5)^d
a) Rewrite the equation to give the cost of a movie ticket in terms of y years after 1953 instead of d decades.
b) Use your equation for part a to estimate the cost of a movie ticket in 1996.
c) Open-ended: Do you think your estimate in part b is reasonable

User Tktsubota
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

(a)
C=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(y/10)

(b) $7.44

(c) Yes.

Explanation:

The exponential function representing the cost of a movie ticket in a large city is as follows:


C=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(d)

(a)

A decade equals 10 years.

Then for n decades the number of years will be,

y = 10 × n

Then the equation of the cost of a movie ticket in terms of y years after 1953 is as follows:


C=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(d)


=1.25\cdot (1.5)^((10* n)/10)\\=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(y/10)

The equation represents the cost of a movie ticket in

(b)

For the year 1953, the value of y is 0.

So, for 1996 the value of y will be, 44.

Compute the cost of a movie ticket in 1996 as follows:


C=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(y/10)


=1.25\cdot (1.5)^(44/10)\\=1.25* 5.9539\\=7.442375\\\approx 7.44

Thus, the cost of a movie ticket in 1996 will be $7.44.

(c)

It is already provided that the cost of a movie ticket in a large city has increased exponentially over the decades since 1953.

So, for the year 1953 the cost of a movie ticket was, $1.25.

And the cost of a movie ticket in 1996 was $7.44.

This value shows an exponential increase in the cost.

Thus, the estimate in part b is reasonable.

User Geg
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories