155k views
2 votes
Which is a reason why historians might change their interpretation of an event?

2 Answers

0 votes

Final answer:

Historians might change their interpretation of an event due to new perspectives, updated values, and shifts in societal focus. Historiography acknowledges the subjective nature of history, and causation helps determine the significance of events.

Step-by-step explanation:

Reasons for Changing Historical Interpretations

Historians might change their interpretation of an event due to various reasons. One key factor is perspective, which is shaped by individual experiences, circumstances, and value systems. This concept of historiography suggests that all history is known and told from a historian's bias. Perspectives can evolve as new information becomes available or as societal values change. Additionally, historians actively work to minimize their biases and consider causation—the 'why' behind events—to rank the importance of different causes. Historians might shift their focus, such as the move in the 1960s and 1970s to consider the lives of ordinary people rather than only elites, which was influenced by the counterculture and politics of the era.

Changes in interpretation also enhance our understanding of the past, allowing us to see through multiple lenses and avoid the pitfalls of a single, possibly biased, viewpoint. As such, revisionism in historical analysis is not just inevitable but also essential for a clearer and more inclusive understanding of our history.

User Chhaya
by
4.5k points
7 votes

Answer:

Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Shabazz
by
5.1k points