Answer:
When the results of a new experiment to test atomic theory do not agree with the theory, scientist will repeat the experiment to make sure that his results are reliable.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scientific context, each new experiment must be performed with precision and following the steps of the scientific method.
An experiment that does not provide reliable data to demonstrate a theory must be reviewed in detail and performed again to confirm the data obtained in the first attempt.
A theory is a postulate that tries to explain a natural phenomenon, but whose argument can be discussed or does not have the acceptance of a law. When the theory is proven and there are no arguments against it, it can be universally accepted and becomes a law.
The other options are not valid due to:
- Scientists worldwide will reject atomic theory because of the new results. A theory cannot be discarded without solid arguments or evidence in order to dismiss it and establish a new one.
- The scientist will change his results to agree with the accepted theory. This would be an unethical procedure and unacceptable to the scientific community.
- Other scientists will reject the results because they do not agree with the theory. The opinion of other scientists is not enough to dismiss a theory, if it has a valid scientific basis.