162k views
0 votes
1. From the beginning of the passage, it is reasonable to infer that:

Question 1 options:

the narrator is worried that he might be crazy.


the narrator is confident of his sanity.


the narrator is angered at the accusation of madness.


the narrator is convinced of his own madness.

User PetrH
by
4.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Incomplete question. Here's likely the excerpt of the passage in "The Tell-Tale Heart";

"TRUE! - nervous - very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses - not destroyed - not dulled them. Above all was the sense of hearing acute. I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell. How, then, am I mad? Hearken! and observe how healthily - how calmly I can tell you the whole story."

Answer:

the narrator is angered at the accusation of madness.

Step-by-step explanation:

Note, the narrator questions the one who accuses him of been mad twice. He said, "why will you say that I am mad?," to show that he (the narrator) is angered by the accusation he asked more likely with a loud tone of voice, "why will you say that I am mad?".

Therefore, based on this textual evidence it is reasonable to infer that the narrator is angered at the accusation of madness.

User Bbaassssiiee
by
4.4k points