Final answer:
The EPA is least likely to support 'corrective justice' as it falls outside their primary mandate, which focuses more on implementing regulations and ensuring fair treatment and meaningful involvement in environmental decision-making processes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is least likely to support and be involved in corrective justice (d). Corrective justice typically involves rectifying wrongs through legal or restitutive means and may not directly fall within the EPA's primary mandate, which is to protect human health and the environment through the enactment and enforcement of regulations.
Environmental justice is defined as the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Fair treatment (a), legal policies (b), and social justice (c) are more aligned with the EPA's mission. For example, the EPA is expected to ensure that all individuals receive fair treatment and are meaningfully involved in the decision-making processes related to environmental policies, which combat instances of environmental racism, such as the disproportionate siting of hazardous waste facilities in minority communities.