Answer:
Full protection of Chesapeake Bay will require consideration of activities within the bay's airshed and not just the bay's watershed
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's consider the options:
A) Agriculture accounts for 77% of the nitrogen and phosphorus entering Chesapeake Bay. Agriculture accounts for 45% of phosphorus and 32% of nitrogen, so cannot account for more than 45% of the pollution from these sources.
B) Automobiles do not contribute to nutrient pollution in Chesapeake Bay. 26% of nitrogen comes from atmospheric sources. Automobiles are a large contributor to atmospheric nitrogen pollutants, so it cannot be concluded that automobiles are not a contributor.
C) Full protection of Chesapeake Bay will require consideration of activities within the bay's airshed and not just the bay's watershed. Since atmospheric sources are tied with fertilizer and manure as the largest contributor of nitrogen pollution, it seems clear that addressing these sources will be required.
D) Repairing broken septic systems will probably result in a large decrease in phosphorus pollution entering Chesapeake Bay. The contribution of septic systems is 4% of the total nitrogen pollution, so eliminating that source will not have a major impact.
E) Wastewater treatment plants do not contribute significantly to nutrient pollution in Chesapeake Bay. Wastewater treatment accounts for about 20% of the pollution, so we'd have to say that is a significant source.