Question

Why did the formation of League of Nation mandates in the former Ottoman Empire lead to conflict?

A. The mandates conflicted with regions formed by earlier agreements.
B. The mandates were different sizes, which made some stronger than others.
C. The mandates had different resources that were important to other regions.
D. The mandates were formed without consideration of cultural, religious, and ethnic borders.

Answer 1

Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

The mandated had different resources which they have in storage are more essential for the other regions

• League of Nations was formed after world war 1
• It was formed inorder to stop war

Answer 2

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Following the defeat of Germany and Ottoman Turkey in World War I, their Asian and African possessions, which were judged not yet ready to govern themselves, were distributed among the victorious Allied powers under the authority of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations (itself an Allied creation). The mandate system was a compromise between the Allies’ wish to retain the former German and Turkish colonies and their pre-Armistice declaration (November 5, 1918) that annexation of territory was not their aim in the war. The mandates were divided into three groups on the basis of their location and their level of political and economic development and were then assigned to individual Allied victors (mandatory powers, or mandatories).

Class A mandates consisted of the former Turkish provinces of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine. These territories were considered sufficiently advanced that their provisional independence was recognized, though they were still subject to Allied administrative control until they were fully able to stand alone. Iraq and Palestine (including modern Jordan and Israel) were assigned to Great Britain, while Turkish-ruled Syria and Lebanon went to France. All Class A mandates reached full independence by 1949.