How do these excerpts use rhetorical appeals to advance their purposes? A)The UN uses logos to convince its readers that children's rights matter, while Quindlen uses ethos to show readers that hunger exists. The UN uses , logos, to convince its readers that children's rights matter, while Quindlen uses , ethos, to show readers that hunger exists. B)The UN uses ethos to affirm that they are experts on the needs of children, while Quindlen’s piece uses logos to show the contrast between idea and reality. The UN uses , ethos , to affirm that they are experts on the needs of children, while Quindlen’s piece uses , logos, to show the contrast between idea and reality. C)The UN document uses ethos to show it has the authority to declare the rights of children, while Quindlen uses pathos to show her readers she understands them. The UN document uses , ethos, to show it has the authority to declare the rights of children, while Quindlen uses , pathos, to show her readers she understands them. D)The UN uses logos to explain why children need special protections, while Quindlen uses pathos to introduce the idea that children go hungry in the summer. The UN uses , logos, to explain why children need special protections, while Quindlen uses , pathos, to introduce the idea that children go hungry in the summer.