Final answer:
The planned regression is subject to omitted variable bias, which can skew the results. Additional variables such as poverty, unemployment, diversity, residential mobility, educational attainment, region, average age, and police expenditures should be added to create a more accurate model of the relationship between police force size and crime rates.
Step-by-step explanation:
The regression that the researcher plans to conduct, using crime rates and the size of the police force, is likely to suffer from omitted variable bias. This bias occurs because there are other important variables that influence crime rates that are not being included in the analysis. To address omitted variable bias, we should consider adding additional control variables such as poverty levels, employment rates, ethnic diversity, residential mobility, and educational attainment. These variables can have a significant impact on crime rates and add complexity to the simple relationship between police presence and crime.
Moreover, variables like region and average age of the population, along with police expenditures, can also play a critical role in shaping crime rates. Including these variables in the regression would help to control for important confounding factors that might otherwise lead to distorted results, enabling a more accurate estimation of the causal effect of police on crime.