149k views
3 votes
Explain the electrolysis of cuso4
using carbon electrode


User Ahmad Beg
by
4.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

If this solution is under standard conditions, then it will be possible to explain the products of this electrolysis (
\rm Cu \, (s),
\rm O_2\, (g),
\rm H^(+)\; (aq)) with reference to the standard reduction potentials.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assume that this solution is under standard conditions, including:

  • A concentration of
    1.00\; \rm mol \cdot L^(-1),
  • A pressure of
    10^5\; \rm Pa, and
  • A temperature of
    25\; \rm ^\circ C.

This
\rm CuSO_4 solution (in water) would include the following species:


  • \rm Cu^(2+) ions,

  • \rm {SO_4}^(2-) ions, and

  • \rm H_2O molecules.

(The carbon electrode is relatively inert and typically won't take part in the chemical reaction.)

Consider the electrolysis of this solution as the sum of the reduction half-reaction and the oxidation half-reaction. Look up the standard reduction potential for half-reactions involving these species:


\rm {\bf Cu^(2+) \; (aq)} + e^(-) \rightleftharpoons Cu^(-)\; \rm (aq). Standard reduction potential:
E^\circ = 0.159\; \rm V.


\rm {\bf Cu^(2+) \; (aq)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons Cu\; \rm (s). Standard reduction potential:
E^\circ = 0.3419\; \rm V.


\rm {\bf {SO_4}^(2-)} + {\bf H_2O\; (l)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons {SO_3}^(2-) + 2\; OH^(-). Standard reduction potential:
E^\circ = -0.936\; \rm V.


\rm 2\; {\bf H_2O\, (l)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons H_2\, (g) + 2\; OH^(-)\, (aq). Standard reduction potential:
E^(\circ) = -0.828\; \rm V.


\rm O_2 \, (g) + 4\; H^(+)\, (aq) + 4\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons 2\; {\bf H_2O\, (l)}. Standard reduction potential:
E^(\circ) = 1.229\; \rm V.

(Species found in this solution are shown in bold typeface.)

Reduction Half-reaction

Note, that in the first four reactions, species from this solution are all on the same side as
\rm e^(-). In other words, in those four reactions, these species would gain electrons and are reduced. These reactions are thus plausible reduction half-reactions. The standard electrode potential of each half reaction will be the same as the standard reduction potential. Because reduction takes place at the cathode, these potentials are denoted as
E^\circ(\text{cathode}).


\rm {\bf Cu^(2+) \; (aq)} + e^(-) \rightleftharpoons Cu^(-)\; \rm (aq).
E^\circ(\text{cathode}) = 0.159\; \rm V.


\rm {\bf Cu^(2+) \; (aq)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons Cu\; \rm (s).
E^\circ(\text{cathode}) = 0.3419\; \rm V.


\rm {\bf {SO_4}^(2-)} + {\bf H_2O\; (l)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons {SO_3}^(2-) + 2\; OH^(-).
E^\circ(\text{cathode}) = -0.936\; \rm V.


\rm 2\; {\bf H_2O\, (l)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons H_2\, (g) + 2\; OH^(-)\, (aq).
E^(\circ)(\text{cathode}) = -0.828\; \rm V.

The only reduction half-reaction that will take place will be the one with the most positive (least negative) electrode potential. Among these four plausible half-reaction, that reaction would be the reduction of
\rm Cu^(2+)\; (aq) to
\rm Cu\, (s) (elemental copper,)
\rm {\bf Cu^(2+) \; (aq)} + 2\; e^(-) \rightleftharpoons Cu\; \rm (s), with an electrode potential of
0.3419\; \rm V. That explains why metallic copper will deposit on the cathode.

Oxidation Half-reaction

On the other hand, the reaction
\rm 2\; {\bf H_2O\, (l)} \rightleftharpoons O_2 \, (g) + 4\; H^(+)\, (aq) + 4\; e^(-) seems to be the only one that involves species from this solution on the opposite side of
\rm e^(-). The actual reaction would take place in the other direction:


\rm 2\; {\bf H_2O\, (l)} \rightleftharpoons O_2 \, (g) + 4\; H^(+)\, (aq) + 4\; e^(-).

The corresponding electrode potential will be the opposite of the standard reduction potential. Because this reaction corresponds to oxidation, it will happen at the anode.


E^\circ(\text{anode}) = -E^(\circ) = -1.229\; \rm V.

That explains why
\rm O_2\, (g) will be produced at the anode.

Overall Reaction

Multiply coefficients in the reduction half-reaction by two and combine the two half-reactions. Make sure that electrons are eliminated from both sides of this equation:


\rm 2\; Cu^(2+)\, (aq) + 2\; H_2O\, (l) \to 2\; Cu\, (s) + O_2\, (g) + 4\; H^(+)\, (aq).


\rm {SO_4}^(2-)\, (aq) would be the spectator ion. Add that to the reaction to obtain the chemical equation of this electrolysis:


\rm 2\; CuSO_4\, (aq) + 2\; H_2O\, (l) \rightleftharpoons 2\; Cu\, (s) + O_2\, (g) + 2\; H_2SO_4.

User Pratik Bhoir
by
3.8k points