Question

How effective is the introduction [paragraphs 1-2] at posing the question of whether the Trojan War is real or a myth?

A
Very effective; it summarizes some of the myths surrounding the Trojan War and describes the evidence that it was also a reality.
B
Mostly effective; it describes the reasons why archaeologists believe the Trojan War may have been real, but mentions myths only briefly.
C
Somewhat effective; it explores the causes of archaeologists' interest in the Trojan War, but does not address how this relates to myth.
D
Not at all effective; it outlines the story of the Trojan War, but does not explain why there is doubt about whether it is reality or myth.

Answer 1

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

B

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because the Trojan horse was real, and multiple sources have documented it. As the war was fought for a woman, and the sources have told us of the logic involved, the evidence given should be classified as real. In conclusion of this, the introduction poses for the passage to be real.