134k views
2 votes
Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointe permanently rather than on a periodic basis? Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence. - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78 O Permanent appointments allow for greater regulation but less independence. O Periodic appointments promote a fatal independence. O Periodic appointments are hard to regulate O Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's independence​

Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointe permanently rather than on a periodic-example-1

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

just did it

User Snowguy
by
5.3k points
4 votes

Answer: D. Periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.

Explanation: Just took the test on edge

User Travis Liew
by
6.1k points