74.5k views
2 votes
List three ways the Roman Republic was different from a monarchy ruled by a single king. Use what you learned about the structure of the Roman government earlier in the lesson.

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

Well the roman republic was a democracy the government consisted of the Senate and four assemblies: the Comitia Curiata, the Comitia Centuriata, the Concilium Plebis, and the Comitia Tributa.

Unlike the monarchy the roman republic held voting its an essential part to its governance, with participation only being afforded to Roman citizens. Upper class interests, centered in the urban political environment.In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians.

The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jolie
by
5.8k points
5 votes

Answer:

Actual pasted answer off of Edmentum!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

1. A king is not elected. He gets his power by birth or by his control over the military. The Roman Republic had assemblies to elect its leaders.

2. A king has absolute power. He makes laws and decisions that no one can question. In the Roman Republic, no one had such power. The consuls’ power was limited by their one-year terms. Each consul could overrule the other.

3. In a kingdom, there is no limiting the king’s power. If the king is cruel, he can treat his subjects badly. In the Roman Republic, there were laws to protect the rights of citizens. The tribunes could reject unfair decisions by the patricians.

User Aarjav
by
5.4k points