Answer:
Democracy in the Kingdom of Bhutan was late, but it was a blessing for the country.
Step-by-step explanation:
The term "democracy" related to the kingdom of Bhutan is a controversial subject. Democracy was introduced late in the country, which has spent years as an absolutist monarchy.
An absolutist monarchy is something dangerous for a country, since there are no limits to the power of the king, in addition to the fact that there is no power for the people, which can stimulate the creation of events where the abso- lence of monarchic power becomes imminent. In this case, democracy is a blessing for the country, since through it the power of the king is limited and the population has the power to demand and demand from its rulers improvements that meet their needs.
However, democracy has not been successful in making citizens happy, as party fights, broken promises and fallacies are constantly seen among those who want to be elected.
The population claims that in terms of peace and harmony, the absolutist monarchy was better than democracy, but we must not forget that democracy allows freedom and the right to choose the population, while still being a blessing, even in the midst of problems.