167k views
4 votes
Do you agree with Professor Diamond's thesis that Paleolithic hunter-gatherers may have been better off than their neolithic farming cousins? Explain your position.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Yes, professor Diamond is right in many senses.

Step-by-step explanation:

For example, hunter-gatherers had healthier diets and healthier bodies than neolithic farmers. The hunter-gatherer diet was based on a great variety of fruits, vegetables, meats, while the neolithic farmer diet was based on a few staples like wheat or barley.

And while the hunter-gatherer move around constantly in search for food, and a had a fit physique, the neolithic farmer often did very hard work on the farm, that was also hard on the body.

Hunter-gatherer society was also more egalitarian, social hierarchies were soft or even non-existant in some tribes. Neolithic society became stratified, and a few people at the top began to take possession of the food surpluses that farming produced.

User Fryeguy
by
7.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.