379,567 views
11 votes
11 votes
Connor wrote the following argument for an advertisement:

Trained service dogs should be provided for all people in need. For people who don’t have the full use of their arms or legs, service dogs can open doors and elevators, pick up objects, and even exchange money for goods. For people with impaired hearing, service dogs can alert people to door knocks, smoke alarms, alarm clocks, and even the call of a name. For people whose vision is impaired, service dogs can help people navigate city streets safely. A trained service dog can bring safety and freedom to tens of thousands of individuals.

Which concluding statement restates the argument’s claim?

A.
Dogs can receive adequate training to provide services that help a variety of people.
B.
For people who have physical disabilities, service dogs make excellent companions.
C.
For people coping with the loss of mobility, hearing, or sight, service dogs provide security and independence.
D.
For dogs that enjoy the company of people, there is no more worthwhile activity than providing services to people in need.

User Toofly
by
2.5k points

2 Answers

16 votes
16 votes

Answer: I had got c

Explanation: I had learned this in class

User TheOnlyXan
by
2.7k points
11 votes
11 votes

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

For people coping with the loss of mobility, hearing, or sight, service dogs provide security and independence.

User Gary Liu
by
2.8k points