73.0k views
2 votes
When an experiment result seems to only partly support a hypothesis, a researcher should consider which of the following?a. Accounting for the research biasesb. Exploring alternation explanationc. Formulating scientific lawd. Manipulating data

User Radames
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

b. Exploring alternation explanation

Explanation:

Experiments are carried out in controlled conditions to confirm a known truth, examine the validity of a hypothesis, or evaluate the efficacy of something that has never been tried before.

SO, when an experiment result seems only partly to support a hypothesis, the best thing to do is to consider exploring alternative explanations through modification of the hypothesis.

A scientific should not be formulated because it is when we have a valid theory that we can formulate a scientific law.

Also, we cannot manipulate the experiment's data because it is not part of the code and conduct of carrying out research.

User StanislavL
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories