Final answer:
A hypothesis is considered fully proven when other scientists are able to repeat the experiment and achieve the same results, supporting the hypothesis through controlled experimentation and observation, which is further solidified through peer-reviewed publication.
Step-by-step explanation:
For a hypothesis to be considered fully proven, it is essential that other scientists must repeat the experiment and get the same results. This process of independent replication confirms that the experimental results are reliable and not just due to chance or specific conditions of a single study. In addition to replication, for a hypothesis to be accepted as a scientific hypothesis, it must be a proposed explanation that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation.
Moreover, a hypothesis needs to be tested under controlled conditions, which means conditions where a single variable changes. This systematic approach is vital in validating a hypothesis. While an increasing number of experiments agreeing with a hypothesis strengthens its validity, a hypothesis is never fully proven in an absolute sense, as future evidence may provide contradictory results.
Finally, the dissemination of the hypothesis and the results through a published scientific article is crucial for the scientific community to evaluate and build upon the research, further solidifying the hypothesis within the scientific discourse.