Answer:
B) There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
Explanation:
Given that:
the null hypothesis is;
![H_o : p =0.10](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/z2urfye29p7hz40ckohy6ha25tjxm8tvqa.png)
the alternative hypothesis is:
![H_a : p >0.10](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/x6xbf200ik4z2lhtv7pnwfi8zyqxycofzd.png)
The p - value for the hypothesis is 0.09
The level of significance ∝ = 0.025
The Decision rule is that to reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than the level of significance ∝.
Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis because the p-value is greater than the level of significance , therefore:
There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.