117k views
0 votes
How did the arguments of eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government differ from those of the colonists who influenced the drafting of the Articles of Confederation?

a. Eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government wanted to increase the power of the legislature, but the colonists believed that the executive should be the most powerful branch of government.
b. Eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government wanted to give more power to the president, but the colonists believed that the legislature should be the most powerful branch of government
c. Eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government wanted a more parliamentary system, but colonists preferred a representative democracy with a distinct separation of powers.
d. Eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government felt there were too many checks and balances, but the colonists supported the separation of powers because they felt it would protect individual liberties.

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

The arguments of eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government differed from those of the colonists who influenced the drafting of the Articles of Confederation is this way:

b. Eighteenth-century critics of the Constitution who believed it prescribed too weak a national government wanted to give more power to the president, but the colonists believed that the legislature should be the most powerful branch of government.

Step-by-step explanation:

The colonists believed that the legislature should be the most powerful branch of government because as a republic, power emanates and resides with the people. The people are ably represented by their representatives, who are members of the legislature. The President cannot be a representative of all the people. The Judiciary cannot represent all the people. But, the legislature or Congress represents all the people and ultimate power should belong to it.

User KarlP
by
3.4k points