Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
![H_o : p = 10](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/tprwi12ds42vee83yva7rzwvlq5oy7gtpj.png)
The alternative hypothesis is:
![H_1 : p > 10](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/geydj0rofhv8ntoy9twpne3ajxgkueym3x.png)
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.