Question

In the second case study, why did the court MOST likely feel that the agent's limited dealings with the buyer did not constitute the creation of an agency? A) The agent never spoke directly with the buyer. B) Dual agency is illegal. C) The buyer and agent did not complete an agency agreement, either oral or written. D) The buyer did not like the agent from the very beginning.

Answer 1

C) The buyer and agent did not complete an agency agreement, either oral or written.

Step-by-step explanation:

Agency agreement, which is a binding contract between an agent and another person, (most likely a buyer) is an important document which helps to establish the relationship between both and the agency which renders the help. Since, there was no agreement whether oral or written, their dealings do not constitute the creation of an agency.