Answer:
x = 2.32011574011
Explanation:
The problem with your original equation is that it is a long way of saying ...
log(x) -log(x) -1 = 2log(x-1)
0 -1 = 2log(x-1)
which has the solution ...
-1/2 = log(x -1)
1/√10 = x -1
x = 1 + 1/√10 ≈ 1.3162278
__
We have asked for clarification, and what we got was ...
![\log{(x)}-\log{(x-1^2)}=2\log{(x-1)}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/ccxctia9q8h4q0rht1e5elqr5y9k14n0cc.png)
which, again, is a long way of saying ...
![\log{(x)}-\log{(x-1)}=2\log{(x-1)}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/f9wbexxt0q79366z8jtz52z97lmycrb728.png)
The other reasonable interpretation of your 'clarified' equation is ...
![\log{(x)}-\log{((x-1)^2)}=2\log{(x-1)}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/c88huvw8n1w0e1lgo5nj3sfmuq7vnnl0nj.png)
which you already have an answer to. You have declared that a "misconception."
So, we are left with the interpretation that the equation you want a solution to is ...
![\log{(x)}-\log{(x-1)}=2\log{(x-1)}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/f9wbexxt0q79366z8jtz52z97lmycrb728.png)
_____
When solving these graphically, I like to write the equation as a function whose zero(s) we're trying to find. For this, when we subtract the right side, we get ...
![f(x)=\log{(x)}-3\log{(x-1)}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/iysod987x6b2io8hbefcxlhegj3c221q4q.png)
A graphing calculator shows that f(x) = 0 when ...
x ≈ 2.32011574011
__
If you don't like my interpretation, check out the second attachment. It has your x-1² as the argument of the middle term. You can see that the calculator interpreted that the same way I did (as required by the order of operations).