Question

Mika has borrowed $5,000 from her cousin Jun and not repaid it. Now, Mika is selling her house to Jun’s nephew, Cheong. As Mika writes up the contract, Jun tells her that if she doesn’t sell the house at a steeply discounted price, Jun will take the matter of the $5,000 to court. What is true about this situation?

Answer 1

Jun's pressure and influence has invalidated Mika's consent.

Step-by-step explanation:

By threatening Mika with prosecution if she doesn't set a discount for the sale of her house on the grounds of her debt to her, she has influenced Jun's consent or rather coerced it and therefore Mika's consent is invalidated in the agreement. Consent is free under law if contract and should be given under undue influence, duress or any other vitiating factor that will render the contract null and void such as the example above