231k views
5 votes
The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. The correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. Which best describes the strength of the correlation and what is true about the causation between the variables?

The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number-example-1

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer: B) It is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely casual

Correct on edge 2020!

User Davoclavo
by
4.7k points
4 votes

Answer: It is a weak negative correlation and it is not likely causal.

Explanation:

Given: The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. The correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26.

Variables : "number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime" and "number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes".

Since -0.26 is more closer to 0 as compared to 1 , so it describes a weak negative correlation.

Also, it is not likely causal as number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime not cause number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes.

User Kurt Schwehr
by
4.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.