Answer:
Kim's identity is particularly complicated. He is European by birth, but he has been immersed the culture of India his whole life. Kim displays the traits of both the British and the Indians, but he considers the British superior to the natives, as seen in this interaction with an Indian friend: “There was some justification for Kim—he had kicked Lala Dinanath's boy off the trunnions—since the English held the Punjab and Kim was English.”
However, Kim is not comfortable with the idea of interacting with Europeans, partly because of the kind of life he leads:
As he reached the years of indiscretion, he learned to avoid missionaries and white men of serious aspect who asked who he was, and what he did. For Kim did nothing with an immense success. . . . [and] missionaries and secretaries of charitable societies could not see the beauty of [what he did].
Kim avoids British men and women who live in India. Since he has grown up with the natives, he shares their mistrust of the Europeans.
Please note, this is the exact wording for the question on edmentum/plato so you might want to change it up a bit! Good luck :D