86.9k views
4 votes
Kaitlin compared the statistics from her team's baseball season. She determined that having fewer hits did not imply that a player caught more or fewer balls. What should she conclude? a. There is no correlation between the number of hits and the number of balls caught. b. There is a correlation between the number of hits and the number of balls caught. There may or may not be causation. Further studies would have to be done to determine this. c.There is a correlation between number of hits and number of balls caught. However, there is no causation. This is because there is probably a decrease in the number of balls caught with a decrease in the number of hits.

User Krivvenz
by
5.0k points

2 Answers

3 votes
The correct answer is C
User Marawan Mamdouh
by
5.0k points
5 votes

Answer: c.There is a correlation between number of hits and number of balls caught. However, there is no causation. This is because there is probably a decrease in the number of balls caught with a decrease in the number of hits.

Explanation:

  • Correlation is a term used to define a relationship between two variables.
  • Causation is a term used to define the effect of one variable on other.

Given, Kaitlin compared the statistics from her team's baseball season. She determined that having fewer hits did not imply that a player caught more or fewer balls.

There is a correlation between number of hits and number of balls caught. However, there is no causation as " fewer hits did not imply that a player caught more or fewer balls.".

This is because there is probably a decrease in the number of balls caught with a decrease in the number of hits.

Hence, the correct option is "c".

User Fscof
by
6.1k points