Question

In a discussion, Liya points out that the authors of the three articles being

discussed are all from the United States. She wonders if their perspective on
climate change is too narrow, and whether they should find more diverse
sources. Which discussion technique is she most clearly using?

Answer 1

Liya is using the discussion technique of evaluating source diversity, highlighting the importance of varied perspectives in research, especially regarding global issues like climate change.

Step-by-step explanation:

Liya is employing the discussion technique of examining the source diversity of the articles in question. This technique implicates the breadth and variety of perspectives presented in the research. She's pointing out a potential geographical bias, which may lead to a narrower perspective on climate change. It is valuable in a discussion about such a global issue to seek out and consider diverse viewpoints to form a more holistic understanding.

In any research, particularly in topics as complex and wide-ranging as climate change, engaging with diverse sources is fundamental. It allows for a multi-faceted exploration of the subject, incorporating different cultural, political, and scientific viewpoints which can enrich the overall analysis and reduce the risk of a skewed narrative. Therefore, Liya's critical approach to the authors' geographic homogeneity suggests she understands the importance of -source credibility and -diversity for a well-rounded discussion.

Answer 2

She is using a discussion technique called "Think, Pair, Share"

Step-by-step explanation:

You can see in the question above that Liya, after reading the articles and gathering interpretations about them, came to a conclusion that she decided to share with a group of people. This discussion technique is called "Think, Pair, Share" and occurs when an individual thinks about an information he has received (in this case, articles), resonates with reason about it and shares it with an audience that is interested.