Question

The following passage is Article 6 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, approved by the National Assembly of France, August 26, 1789. Use the passage to answer the following question: Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law. How would English Enlightenment philosopher John Locke feel about the article? (5 points) He would disapprove of it because it calls for limited individual freedom. He would disapprove of it because it implies that humans are naturally bad. He would approve of it because it appeals to the idea of natural law. He would approve of it because it proves the theory of the social contract.

Answer 1

He would support it because he claimed that the rights mentioned are unalienable and are self-evident. It is the duty of the law and the state to protect these rights because nobody has the right to take them away. They will only be forbidden if others try to take take those rights away from you. If someone tries to kill you, they go to jail, that is a simple way of explaining it. He tried to take your life so you take his liberty

Answer 2

He would approve of it because it appeals to the idea of natural law.

Step-by-step explanation:

English Enlightenment philosopher John Locke would approve of this article because it appeals to the idea of natural law. The passage notes that, "These limits [of enjoyment] can only be determined by law." This basically translates to the fact that the government draws the line for how much people can enjoy themselves. This leads to the topic of social contract. It is the agreement between the people and their government, where the people give up some of their individual freedoms in exchange for protection provided by the government. Like I mentioned earlier about the article, there are limits to how people can enjoy themselves, but this also guarantee's safety. Such a contract proved to work very well, as it still exists today. Going back to the idea of natural law, people are still able to keep some of their individual freedoms, and are able to express themselves as an individual in a number of ways without too many restrictions (which leads to the concept of humanism). All of this falls under the category of what John Locke would approve.

Hope this helps :)