Answer:
a) We reject H₀ we have enough evidence for that
b) 1.-The survey was made over a district, results will surely be different if the survey is carried out over a whole state ( considering urban and rural areas)
2.-In a district we find an equalized level of salaries, which could be associated with a similar level of habits
Explanation:
We have to develop a proportion test. One tail-test
Population proportion mean (national proportion) p₀ = 72 %
Sample information
sample proportion 271/300 p = 0,90 p = 90 %
We assume Confidence Interval 90 % then α = 0,1
Test Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis H₀ p = p₀
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ p > p₀
As α = 0,1 and
We look at z-table for z(c) and find z(c) = 1,28
And we compute z(s) as
z(s) = ( p - p₀ ) √ (p₀q₀/n
z(s) = ( 0,9 - 0,72 ) /√(0,72)*(0,28)/300
z(s) = 0,18 / √0,1296/300
z(s) = 0,18/ 0,026
z(s) = 6,92
z(s) > z(c) 6,92 > 1,28
As z(s) is bigger than z(c), z(s) is in the rejection region, so we reject the null hypothesis. We have enough evidence to claim that the proportion in the district is bigger than the national one.
b)1. The survey was made over a district, results will surely be different if the survey is carried out over a whole state ( considering urban and rural areas)
2.-In a district we find an equalized level of salaries, which could be associated with a similar level of habits